Healthcare reform and quality: Scotland
نویسندگان
چکیده
Scotland is a small nation within the United Kingdom (UK) that has recently had a high degree of autonomy over health policy, such that it has adopted a very different direction, not only from England, but also many other health systems around the world. Under a narrative of mutuality, Scottish health policy is based on partnership; working across government, health and social care services, professions and civil society to deliver nationally agreed health outcomes, increasingly through prevention and anticipatory care, aiming for social solidarity and equity. It faces similar drivers for change as other countries, but adopts a distinct vision of its goals and direction. Its quality ambitions focus on person-centredness, safety and effectiveness. Stability of the quality infrastructure, clinical leadership and strong networks facilitate clarity of purpose and communication. There have been many substantive improvements in life expectancy, morbidity and mortality, as well as in healthcare associated infections and waiting times, although it is difficult to be sure about attribution of causes. The major current challenge is in reducing health inequalities, for which policy is focussed on sustainable economic growth and improved effectiveness and efficiency.
منابع مشابه
Does the Accountable Care Act Aim to Promote Quality, Health, and Control Costs or Has It Missed the Mark? ;Comment on “Health System Reform in the United States”
McDonough’s perspective on healthcare reform in the US provides a clear, coherent analysis of the mix of access and delivery reforms in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) aka Obamacare. As noted by McDonough, this major reform bill is designed to expand access for health coverage that includes both prevention and treatment benefits among uninsured Americans. Additionally, this legislation includes s...
متن کاملRecent Iranian Health System Reform: An Operational Perspective to Improve Health Services Quality
The operational management of healthcare services is expected to directly touch patient experiences. Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MoHME) for the first time, as such, has sought to improve the operational management of healthcare delivery within a reform agenda by setting benchmarks for ‘number of visit per hour’ and waiting time in outpatient clinics of about 700 affiliated...
متن کاملThe Relationship Between the Scope of Essential Health Benefits and Statutory Financing: An International Comparison Across Eight European Countries
Background Both rising healthcare costs and the global financial crisis have fueled a search for policy tools in order to avoid unsustainable future financing of essential health benefits. The scope of essential health benefits (the range of services covered) and depth of coverage (the proportion of costs of the covered benefits that is covered publicly) are corresponding variables in determini...
متن کاملThe Changing National Health Service: Market-Based Reform and Morality; Comment on “Morality and Markets in the NHS”
This commentary explores some of the issues raised by Gilbert et al.short communication, Morality and Markets in the NHS. The increasing role of market mechanisms and the changing types of healthcare providers together with the use of choice and competition to drive improvements in quality in the National Health Service (NHS), all have important ethical implications. In order for the NHS to con...
متن کاملAssessing the relative healthcare spending needs of the UK pdf
This paper considers the relative healthcare expenditure needs of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. It applies the NHS weighted capitation formula – used to allocate resources to English Primary Care Trusts – to Health Boards in Wales and Scotland and Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland. According to this formula, per capita healthcare expenditure need in Wales is 16%...
متن کامل